Musing: What makes a Good book vs a Great book?
1 May 2012
Someone on a forum I visit asked: what makes a book Good Literature and what makes a book Great Literature? It got me thinking and I tried to distill my thoughts…..
Good literature is:
-Well written
Grammatically correct or appropriate for character. Not repetitive, well chosen and crafted words/sentences. You can tell the difference when someone simply poured all their thoughts out on a page vs when someone thought and thought and edited until they honed their words down to the perfect combination. No trite writing, characters, or events
-Believable
The world and characters created should follow the author own rules and not disengage the reader from the text.
-Well plotted
Enough setting and detail to add depth but a quick enough plot to maintain interest
-Thought provoking
The events, characters, and/or author’s voice should stay with you and keep you musing over the book.
Great literature is all this plus at its center are universal human themes. Not themes that a limited audience can relate to such as: Single girl in the city. Rather themes that all people across nationalities, circumstance, and centuries can closely relate to and feel the Truth of.
I just finished the Hunchback of Notre Dame which is without a doubt a Great book. The themes that really stood out for me in this story were the outsider status of each of the characters and their helplessness with in Fate’s design. I really felt the chaos and hysteria of tiny humans as the massive force of history marched on.
What do you think? What makes Good literature vs Great literature?









